<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Singer Solution to World Poverty (circa 1999)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://darrenhe.com/blog/the-singer-solution-to-world-poverty-circa-1999/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://darrenhe.com/blog/the-singer-solution-to-world-poverty-circa-1999/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:49:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: darrenhe</title>
		<link>http://darrenhe.com/blog/the-singer-solution-to-world-poverty-circa-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>darrenhe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darrenhe.com/blog/?p=373#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Of course, it&#039;s normal to have some &quot;socialist&quot; tendencies - after all, our government is far from purely capitalistic. For example, welfare, Medicare, and those HUGE government bailouts. I think each person really has to weigh it out for themselves. On one hand, you have morals, ethics, compassion, and sense of righteousness. On the other hand, I think the world is approaching a zero-sum game: by giving money to someone else, you are decreasing your own net worth and well-being relative to both the person you are helping and the people are not donating to charity.

I&#039;ll still donate to charities that I feel are a good cause (not that I have lots of disposable income), but it leads me to question whether I truly donate out of goodwill, or if I donate to look good or make myself feel better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, it&#8217;s normal to have some &#8220;socialist&#8221; tendencies &#8211; after all, our government is far from purely capitalistic. For example, welfare, Medicare, and those HUGE government bailouts. I think each person really has to weigh it out for themselves. On one hand, you have morals, ethics, compassion, and sense of righteousness. On the other hand, I think the world is approaching a zero-sum game: by giving money to someone else, you are decreasing your own net worth and well-being relative to both the person you are helping and the people are not donating to charity.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll still donate to charities that I feel are a good cause (not that I have lots of disposable income), but it leads me to question whether I truly donate out of goodwill, or if I donate to look good or make myself feel better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "A"</title>
		<link>http://darrenhe.com/blog/the-singer-solution-to-world-poverty-circa-1999/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>"A"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darrenhe.com/blog/?p=373#comment-87</guid>
		<description>The argument is 1-sided and appears problematic from an incentives standpoint.  Or is it just a vision issue? (Or do I have socialist/communist tendencies?)  What do you think is (are) the solution (s)?  What should people work towards?  Should everyone do it as they see fit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The argument is 1-sided and appears problematic from an incentives standpoint.  Or is it just a vision issue? (Or do I have socialist/communist tendencies?)  What do you think is (are) the solution (s)?  What should people work towards?  Should everyone do it as they see fit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

